#Forbes ’Why Does That Create A Constitutional Problem?’: KBJ Spars With Attorney Over Voting Rights
‘Why Does That Create A Constitutional Problem?’: KBJ Spars With Attorney Over Voting Rights
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case Robinson v. Callais and Louisiana v. Callais, which could alter Section Two of the Voting Rights’ Act of 1965. During which, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked amicus curiae Hashim Mooppan about “race-neutral criteria.”
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://ift.tt/WEAQuZq
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: https://ift.tt/CjZ3BuO
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Thank you for your support in keeping this website running.💛
View on “Tokyo Trend News”
コメントを送信